PENINGKATAN KESADARAN ETIKA DAN BERPIKIR KRITIS MELALUI EDUKASI PENGGUNAAN GENERATIVE AI
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
The rapid development of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has significantly influenced various aspects of daily life, including the field of education. While generative AI offers substantial benefits in enhancing creativity, learning efficiency, and access to information, its uncontrolled and unethical use may negatively affect users’ critical thinking abilities, academic integrity, and moral responsibility. This community service activity aims to increase awareness of ethical considerations and critical thinking skills through educational programs on the responsible use of generative AI. The implementation methods include educational seminars, interactive discussions, and practical demonstrations on the proper, ethical, and critical use of generative AI tools in learning activities. The program targets community members and learners, emphasizing the importance of understanding both the advantages and potential risks of generative AI. The results of the activity indicate an improvement in participants’ understanding of ethical AI use, increased awareness of the limitations of generative AI, and enhanced critical thinking in evaluating AI-generated information. This activity is expected to contribute to the development of responsible, ethical, and reflective AI users, thereby supporting the improvement of learning quality in the digital era.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
[2.] Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2023). So what if ChatGPT wrote it? Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
[3.] Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
[4.] Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
[5.] Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
[6.] OECD. (2021). Artificial intelligence, ethics and public policy. OECD Publishing.
[7.] UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO Publishing.
[8.] DRTPM. (2023). Panduan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat. Kemdikbudristek.
[9.] Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.
[10.] Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1).
[11.] Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.
[12.] Hobbs, R. (2017). Create to learn: Introduction to digital literacy. Wiley.
[13.] OECD. (2022). Artificial intelligence and the future of education. OECD Publishing.
[14.] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
[15.] UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the ethics of artificial intelligence. UNESCO Publishing.
[16.] Zhai, X., et al. (2023). Generative AI in education: Opportunities, challenges, and implications. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118.