##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Pandi Barita Nauli Simangunsong
Novriadi Antonius Siagian
Matias Julyus Fika Sirait
Maulidina
Pristiwanto

Abstract

Pelatihan Penggunaan Mendeley dalam Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah bagi Komunitas Akademik dilaksanakan di Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kesehatan Darmo dengan tujuan untuk meningkatkan kompetensi dosen dalam mengelola referensi secara efisien dan sesuai standar akademik. Mendeley sebagai aplikasi manajemen referensi dipilih karena kemampuannya dalam menyusun sitasi dan daftar pustaka secara otomatis serta integrasinya dengan berbagai platform penulisan ilmiah. Pelatihan ini mencakup materi instalasi, pembuatan akun, penggunaan Mendeley secara manual, dan pemanfaatan fitur Web Importer. Metode pelatihan bersifat partisipatif dan berbasis praktik langsung. Hasil evaluasi menunjukkan bahwa 92% peserta merasa pelatihan ini sangat bermanfaat dan 89% tertarik untuk mengikuti pelatihan lanjutan. Selain itu, peserta mengusulkan agar kegiatan ini dijadikan program rutin untuk mendukung peningkatan mutu publikasi ilmiah dosen. Pelatihan ini terbukti efektif dalam membekali dosen dengan keterampilan teknis yang relevan dan mendorong terbentuknya budaya penulisan ilmiah yang profesional dan terstandar di lingkungan perguruan tinggi.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
Simangunsong, P. B. N., Siagian, N. A., Sirait, M. J. F., Maulidina, & Pristiwanto. (2025). Penggunaan Mendeley dalam Penulisan Karya Tulis Ilmiah bagi Komunitas Akademik. Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia (Jumas), 4(02), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.54209/jumas.v4i02.265
References
[1.] Singh, J. (2010). Mendeley: A free research management tool for desktop and web. Journal of Pharmacology & Pharmacotherapeutics, 1(1), 62–63. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.64539
[2.] Kusumaningsih, D. (2018). Mendeley as a reference management and citation generator for academic articles. Proceedings of ICASE 2018. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icase-18.2018.22
[3.] Iskandar, A. A. P., & Patak, A. A. (2019). The significance of Mendeley usage on the accuracy of citation and references. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation, 2(4), 108–114. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v2i4.51
[4.] Orhan Sungur, M. O., & Seyhan, T. Ö. (2013). Writing references and using citation management software. Turkish Journal of Urology, 39(Suppl 1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2013.050
[5.] Zahedi, Z., Costas, R., & Wouters, P. (2017). Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23738
[6.] Jeng, W., He, D., & Jiang, J. (2015). User participation in an academic social networking service: A survey of open group users on Mendeley. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(5), 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23225
[7.] Haustein, S., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: The effect of document properties and collaboration patterns. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0120495. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120495
[8.] Thelwall, M., & Wilson, P. (2016). Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles: An analysis of 45 fields. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(8), 1962–1972. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23501
[9.] Mohammadi, E., & Thelwall, M. (2014). Mendeley readership altmetrics for the social sciences and humanities: Research evaluation and knowledge flows. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(8), 1627–1638. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23071
[10.] Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037–2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833
[11.] Hammarfelt, B. (2014). Using altmetrics for assessing research impact in the humanities. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1419–1430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1261-3
[12.] Priem, J., Piwowar, H. A., & Hemminger, B. M. (2012). Altmetrics in the wild: Using social media to explore scholarly impact. arXiv preprint. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1203.4745
[13.] Torres-Salinas, D., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific communication in Web 2.0. Comunicar, 21(41), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.3916/C41-2013-05
[14.] Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018). On the differences between citations and altmetrics: An investigation of factors driving altmetrics versus citations for Finnish articles. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(6), 832–843. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23934
[15.] Ebrahimy, S., Mohammadpoorasl, A., & Rezaei, N. (2016). Altmetrics: New indicators for scientific impact. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences, 21(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.4103/1735-1995.181989