Pendampingan Teknis Pemeriksaan Fisik Kuantitas Item Pekerjaan pada Pembangunan Gedung
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Physical inspections of construction are the result of follow-up activities from document analysis conducted by the relevant parties, where weaknesses in the reporting of audit results or physical inspections of construction are identified. The physical inspection of construction also seeks significant issues due to differences in interpretation regarding the calculation of work volume during the tender process and the evaluation of work progress. Community Service Activities (PKM) are one of the Tri Dharma of Higher Education, alongside education, teaching, and research. Through this activity, it is hoped that the target community can obtain useful information and then apply and further develop the information provided by the speakers. The implementation method is carried out in two ways: desk audits and direct field inspections. Preliminary surveys/desk audits are conducted on the packages being examined, in accordance with the Work Order, aimed at detecting potential early deviations in the implementation of the packages to be examined. The results of the community service indicate the need for learning development activities through collaborative or community service initiatives aimed at providing assistance in line with the area of expertise. The results of this service also provide recommendations and analyses from experts that are useful for maintaining orderly public financial administration in its usage, thereby allowing for the anticipation of irresponsible parties. The assistance in community service activities also imparts specific knowledge to students regarding the direct application of scientific knowledge. The objective of the construction inspection is to ensure the orderly execution and results of construction work, covering physical aspects including volume and quantity of construction, planning, procurement, management of implementation, and contract control in building construction projects. Therefore, the implementation of PKM provides a supportive solution in the physical inspection of items related to building construction.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
[2] P. Maristyo. Yudhit. Deka. Dan Hardjomuljadi. Sarwono, “Faktor-Faktor Pengaruh Audit Teknik dan FinansiaI pada Proyek Konstruksi”. Jurnal Konstruksia. Vol. 10, No. 1, pp 23-37, 2018.
[3] A. W. Mardijuwono and C. Subianto, “lndependence, professionalism, professionaI skepticism: The reIation toward the resulted audit quality,” Asian Journal of Accounting Research, voI. 3, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 2018.
[4] S. Budi, S. Sri. dan H. Henry. “Pengembangan Sistem Audit Pengadaan Barang/Jasa untuk Pekerjaan Konstruksi pada Pemerintah Kabupaten Ngawi (Studi Kasus Pembangunan Kantor BP3K Pitu)”. Doctoral dissertation, UMS, 2012.
[5] D. Y. Jumas dan N. Tela, “Analisa kebutuhan standarisasi pengukuran kuantitas (SMM) pada industry konstruksi Indonesia,” Jurnal Rekayasa, vol. 7 no. 1, pp 16-26, 2017.
[6] I. G. Widiartha, A. A. Lestari, B. Proboyo, and I. Santoso, “Hubungan Antara Kuantitas Pekerjaan Dengan Durasi Pada Pekerjaan Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Bertingkat TinggI,” Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, volume. 3, number. 2, pp 1-6, 2014.
[7] Yusril, Y, Pedoman Pelaksanaan Pemeriksaan Barang dan Jasa Konstruksi Berdasarkan Keteknikan, Kesehatan dan Keselamatan Kerja, Perlindungan Sosial Tenaga Kerja, Tata Lingkungan dan Manfaat bagi Masyarakat. Media Ilmiah Teknik Lingkungan, volume. 2, number. 1, pp12-25, 2017.
[8] I. Aulya Reista and dan Ilham, “Implementasi Building Information Modelling dalam Estimasi Volume Pekerjaan Struktural dan Arsitektural,” Journal of Sustainable Construction, volume. 2, number. 1, page. 13–22.
[9] F. F. Remi, “Kajian Faktor Penyebab Cost Overrun Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung,” Jurnal Teknik Mesin (JTM), volume. 6, pp. 94 -101, 2017.
[10] P. Wijaya, S. Leman, B. Proboyo, and I. Santoso, “Keterkaitan Kuantitas Pekerjaan Dengan Durasi dan Tenaga Kerja Pada Proyek Konstruksi Bangunan Bertingkat Tinggi,” Jurnal Dimensi Pratama Teknik Sipil, volume. 4, number. 1, pp 1-7, 2015.
[11] B. Wairooy dan E. A. Hakim, “Risiko Pelaksanaan Manajemen Konstruksi Pembangunan Gedung Negara Pada Tahap Pelaksanaan Fisik/Konstruksi,” Program Studi Persatuan Insinyur Indonesia, vol. 1, no. 1, pp 15-24, 2021.
[12] B. F. Putra, “Analisis Faktor Penyebab dan Mitigasi Waste pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung di Kota Surabaya,” Doctoral dissertation, ITS, 2018.
[13] B. Kurniawan, N. Dewi, I. S. Machfiroh, & S. Sofiyyah, “Model Harga Satuan Dasar Material Setempat di Wilayah Kabupaten Kotabaru,” Jurnal Rekayasa Konstruksi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp 19-28, 2022.
[14] T. D. Kurniawan, “Penerapan SNl 2847 :2019 dalam perhitungan kuantitas pekerjaan kait tulangan,” In SENASTER Seminar National Riset Teknologi Terapan, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2021
[15] R. Jonathan & B. Anondho, “Perbandingan Perhitungan Volume Pekerjaan dak beton bertulang antara metode BlM dengan Konvensional,” JMTS, volume. 4, number. 1, pp 271 - 280, 2021.